Abstract: Suggests that the findings of T. C. Thomason et al (see record 1981-27496-001) interpreted as disproving the eye-movement hypothesis are based on a misunderstanding of the neurolinguistic programming model. Their finding of consistent patterns tends to support the hypothesis that eye movements reflect internal processes regardless of specific stimuli. (3 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).